SR Research
Fast, Accurate, Reliable Eye Tracking
lines

Gaze Contingent Publications

print Print Page

Gaze-Contingent Display
Boundary Paradigm
Saccade Contingent/Transsacadic Perception
Gaze Control/Selection by Eye

Gaze-Contingent Display (moving-window paradigm/artificial scotoma)

Aguilar, C., & Castet, E. (2011). Gaze-contingent simulation of retinopathy: Some potential pitfalls and remedies. Vision Research, 51, 997-1012.

Ashby, J., Yang, J., Evans, K. H. C., & Rayner, K. (2012). Eye movements and the perceptual span in silent and oral reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 634-640.

Bélanger, N. N., Slattery, T. J., Mayberry, R. I., & Rayner K. (2012). Skilled deaf readers have an enhanced perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 23, 816-823.

Bernard, J.-B., Scherlen, A.-C., & Castet, E. (2007). Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: A modest effect of interline spacing on reading speed. Vision Research, 47, 3447-3459.

Bernard, J.-B., Calabrèse, A., & Castet, E. (2014). Role of syllable segmentation processes in peripheral word recognition, Vision Research, 105, 226-232.

Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106, 1465-1477.

Brzezicka, A., Krejtz, I., von Hecker, U., & Laubrock, J. (2012). Eye movement evidence for defocused attention in dysphoria: A perceptual span analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85, 129-133.

Calvo, M. G., & Avero, P. (2008). Affective priming of emotional pictures in parafoveal vision: Left visual field advantage. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8:41-53.

Calvo, M. G., & Eysenck, M. W. (2008). Affective significance enhances covert attention: Roles of anxiety and word familiarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Perception, 61, 1669 - 1686.

Cañal-Bruland, R., Lotz, S., Hagemann, N., Schorer, J., & Strauss, B. (2011). Visual span and change detection in soccer: An expertise study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 302-310.

Castelhano, M. S. & Heaven, C. (2011). Scene context influences without scene gist: Eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 890-896.

Chan, J. P. K., Kamino, D., Binns, M. A., & Ryan, J. D. (2011) Can changes in eye movement scanning alter the age-related deficit in recognition memory?. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:92. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00092.

Cornelissen, F. W., Bruin, K. J., & Kooijman, A. C. (2005). The influence of artificial scotomas on eye-movements during visual search. Optometry & Visual Science, 82. 27-35.

Cornelissen, F. W., & van den Dobbelsteen, J. J. (1999). Heading detection with simulated visual field defects. Visual Impairment Research, 1, 71-84.

Dalrymple, K. A., Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., Barton, J. J. S., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Experiencing simultanagnosia through windowed viewing of complex social scenes. Brain Research, 1367, 265-277.

Dalrymple, K. A., Bischof, W. F., Cameron, D., Barton, J. J. S., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Simulating simultanagnosia: Spatially constricted vision mimics local capture and the global processing deficit. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 445-455.

Fornos, A. P., Sommerhalder, J., & Pelizzone, M. (2011). Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5:57. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00057.

Fornos, A. P., Sommerhalder, J., Rappaz, B., Pelizzone, M., & Safran, A. B. (2006). Processes involved in oculomotor adaptation to eccentric reading. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 47, 1439 - 1447.

Fornos, A. P., Sommerhalder, J., Rappaz, B., Safran, A. B., & Pelizzone, M. (2005). Simulation of artificial vision, III: Do the spatial or temporal characteristics of stimulus pixelization really matter? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 46, 3906-3912.

Foulsham, T., Teszka, R., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Saccade control in natural images is shaped by the information visible at fixation: evidence from asymmetric gaze-contingent windows. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 266-283.

Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2011). If visual saliency predicts search, then why? Evidence from normal and gaze-contingent search tasks in natural scenes. Cognitive Computation, 3, 48-63.

Foulsham, T., Gray, A., Nasiopoulos, E., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Leftward biases in picture scanning and line bisection: A gaze-contingent window study. Vision Research, 78, 14-25.

Gilman, E., & Underwood, G. (2003). Restricting the field of view to investigate the perceptual spans of pianists. Visual Cognition, 10, 201-232.

Gilman, E., & Underwood, G. (2003). The perceptual span during music reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The Mind's Eyes: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (pp. 175-191). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

Garaas, T. W., Nieuwenhuis, T., & Pomplun, M. (2008). A Gaze-contingent paradigm for studying continuous saccadic adaptation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 168, 334-340.

Garaas, T. W., & Pomplun, M. (2011). Distorted object perception following whole-field adaptation of saccadic eye movements. Journal of Vision, 11(1):2, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/1/2, doi:10.1167/11.1.2.

Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2009). The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks. Visual Cognition, 17, 1228-1243.

Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2011). Eye movement monitoring as a process tracing methodology in decision making research. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, & Economics, 4, 125-146.

Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2012). Direct control of fixation times in scene viewing: Evidence from analysis of the distribution of first fixation duration. Visual Cognition, 20, 605-626.

Greene, H. H., & Rayner, K. (2001). Eye movements and familiarity effects in visual search. Vision Research, 41, 3763-3773.

Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P. (2009). Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 167-181.

Harvey, H., & Walker, R. (2014). Reading with peripheral vision: A comparison of reading dynamic scrolling and static text with a simulated central scotoma, Vision Research, 98, 54-60.

Hillstrom, A. P., Scholey, H., Liversedge, S. P., & Benson, V. (2012). The effect of the first glimpse at a scene on eye movements during search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 204-210.

Hsiao, J. H.-W., & Cottrell, G. (2008). Two fixations suffice in face recognition. Psychological Science, 19, 998 - 1006.

Jordan, T. R., McGowan, V. A., & Paterson, K. B. (2012). Reading with a filtered fovea: The influence of visual quality at the point of fixation during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1078-1084.

Jordan, T. R., Almabruk, A. A. A., Gadalla, E. A., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Abedipour, L., & Paterson, K. B. (2014). Reading direction and the central perceptual span: Evidence from Arabic and English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 505-511.

Johnson, A., & Gurnsey, R. (2010). Size scaling compensates for sensitivity loss produced by a simulated central scotoma in a shape-from-texture task. Journal of Vision, 10(12):18, 1-16, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/12/18, doi:10.1167/10.12.18.

Kramer, A. F., Boot, W. R., McCarley, J. S., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, A., & Scialfa, C. T. (2006). Aging, memory and visual search. Acta Psychologica, 122, 288-304.

Kwon, M. Y., Nandy, A. S., & Tjan, B. S. (2013). Rapid and persistent adaptability of human oculomotor control in response to simulated central vision loss. Current Biology, 23, 1663-1669.

Laubrock, J., Cajar, A., & Engbert, R. (2013). Control of fixation duration during scene viewing by interaction of foveal and peripheral processing. Journal of Vision, 13(12):11, 1-20, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/13/12/11, doi:10.1167/13.12.11.

Leung, C. Y., Sugiura, M., Abe, D., & Yoshikawa, L. (2014). The Perceptual Span in Second Language Reading: An Eye-Tracking Study Using a Gaze-Contingent Moving Window Paradigm. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4, 585-594.

Lingnau, A., Schwarzbach, J., & Vorberg, D. (2008). Adaptive strategies for reading with a forced retinal location. Journal of Vision, 8(5):6, 1-18, http://journalofvision.org/8/5/6/, doi:10.1167/8.5.6.

Lingnau, A., Albrecht, T., Schwarzbach, J., & Vorberg, D. (2014). Visual search without central vision - no single pseudofovea location is best. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 7(2):4, 1-14.

Loschky, L. C., Ringer, R. V., Johnson, A. P., Larson, A. M., Neider, M., & Kramer, A. F. (2014). Blur detection is unaffected by cognitive load. Visual Cognition, 22, 522-547.

Macedo, A. F., Crossland, M. D., & Rubin, G. S. (2008). The effect of retinal image slip on peripheral visual acuity. Journal of Vision, 8(14):16, 1-11, http://journalofvision.org/8/14/16/, doi:10.1167/8.14.16.

Miellet, S., He, L., Zhou, X., Lao, J. & Caldara, R. (2012). When East meets West: gaze-contingent Blindspots abolish cultural diversity in eye movements for faces. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(2):5,1-12.

Miellet, S., O'Donnell, P. J., Sereno, S. C. (2009). Parafoveal magnification: Visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 20, 721-728.

Mitra, A. R., Abegg, M., Viswanathan, J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2010). Line bisection in simulated homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1742-1749.

Nuthmann, A. (2013). On the visual span during object search in real-world scenes. Visual Cognition, 21, 803-837.

Nuthmann, A., Beveridge, M. E. L., & Shillcock, R. C. (2014). A binocular moving window technique to study the roles of the two eyes in reading. Visual Cognition, 22, 259-282.

Nuthmann, A., & Matthias, E. (2014). Time course of pseudoneglect in scene viewing. Cortex, 52, 113-119.

Nuthmann, Antje. (2014). How do the regions of the visual field contribute to object search in real-world scenes? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 342-360.

Ogun, O., Viswanathan, J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2011). The effect of central (macula) sparing of contralateral line bisection bias: A study with virtual hemianopia. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3377-3382.

Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., & Jordan, T. R. (2013). Filtered text reveals adult age differences in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Psychology & Aging, 28, 352-364.

Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Malik, S., Abedipour, L., et al. (2014). Reading Direction and the Central Perceptual Span in Urdu and English. PLoS ONE 9(2): e88358. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088358.

Pereira, E. J., & Castelhano, M. S. (2014). Peripheral guidance in scenes: The interaction of scene context and object content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 2056-2072.

Perdreau, F., & Cavanagh, P. (2013). The artistís advantage: Better integration of object information across eye movements. i-Perception, 4(6), 380-395.

Pomplun, M., Reingold, E. M., & Shen, J. (2001). Investigating the visual span in comparative search: The effects of task difficulty and divided attention. Cognition, 81, B57-B67.

Pomplun, M., Reingold, E. M., & Shen, J. (2001). The effects of peripheral and parafoveal cueing and masking on saccadic selectivity in a gaze-contingent window paradigm. Vision Research, 41, 2757-2769.

Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., & Yang, J. (2009). Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 24, 755-760.

Rayner, K., & Johnson, R. L. (2005). Letter-by-letter acquired dyslexia is due to the serial encoding of letters. Psychological Science, 16, 530-534.

Rayner, K. (2014). The gaze-contingent moving window in reading: Development and review. Visual Cognition, 22, 242-258.

Reingold, E. M. (2002). On the perceptual specificity of memory representations. Memory, 10, 365-379.

Reingold, E. M. (2014). Eye tracking research and technology: Towards objective measurement of data quality. Visual Cognition, 22, 635-652.

Reingold, E. M., & Loschky, L. C. (2002). Saliency of peripheral targets in gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, 491-499.

Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2000). Saccadic inhibition and gaze contingent research paradigms. In Kennedy, Alan, Radach, Ralph et al. (Eds.) Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 119-145). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.

Richlan, F., Gagl, B., Schuster, S., Hawelka, S., Humenberger, J., & Hutzler, F. (2013). A new high-speed visual stimulation method for gaze-contingent eye movement and brain activity studies. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7:24. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00024.

Ryu, D., Abernethy, B., Mann, D. L., Poolton, J. M., & Gorman, A. D. (2013). The role of central and peripheral vision in expert decision making. Perception, 42, 591-607.

Saunders, D. R. & Woods, R. L. (2014). Direct measurement of the system latency of gaze-contingent displays. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 439-447.

Scherlen, A.-C., Bernard, J.-P., Calabrese, A., & Castet, E. (2008). Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: Oculo-motor patterns. Vision Research, 48, 1870-1878 .

Seya, Y., & Watanabe, K. (2012). The minimal time required to process visual information in visual search tasks measured by using gaze-contingent visual masking. Perception, 41, 819-830.

Simion, C., & Shimojo, S. (2006). Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference. Vision Research, 46, 3331-3335.

Simpson, S. A., Abegg, M., & Barton, J. J. S. (2011). Rapid adaptation of visual search in simulated hemianopia. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1593-1601.

Slattery, T. J., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movements and display change detection during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1924-1938.

Sommerhalder, G., Oueghlani, E., Bagnoud, B., Leonards, U., Safran, A. B., & Pelizzone, P. (2003). Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning. Vision Research, 43, 269-283.

Sommerhalder, J., Rappaz, B., de Haller, R., Fornos, A. P., Safran, A. B., & Pelizzone, M. (2004). Simulation of artificial vision: II. Eccentric reading of full-page text and the learning of this task. Vision Research, 44, 1693-1706.

Van Belle, G., Busigny, T., Lefèvre, P., Joubert, S., Felician, O., Gentile, F., & Rossion, B. (2011). Impairment of holistic face perception following right occipito-temporal damage in prosopagnosia: converging evidence from gaze-contingency. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3145-3150.

Van Belle, G., De Graef, P., Verfaillie, K., Rossion, B., & Lefèvre, P. (2010). Face inversion impairs holistic perception: Evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. Journal of Vision, 10(5):10, 1-13, http://journalofvision.org/content/10/5/10, doi:10.1167/10.5.10.

Van Belle, G., Lefèvre, P., Laguesse, R., Busigny, T., de Graef, P., Verfaillie, K., & Rossion, B. (2010). Feature-based processing of personally familiar faces in prosopagnosia: Evidence from eye-gaze contingency. Behavioural Neurology, 23, 255-257.

Varsori, M., Perez-Fornos, A., Safran, A. B., & Whatham, A. R. (2004). Development of a viewing strategy during adaptation to an artificial central scotoma. Vision Research, 44, 2691-2705.

Verfaillie, K., Huysegems, S., De Graef. P., & Van Belle, G. (2014). Impaired holistic and analytic face processing in congenital prosopagnosia: Evidence from the eye-contingent mask/window paradigm. Visual Cognition, 22, 503-521.

Võ, M. L.-H., & Henderson, J. M. (2011). Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1742-1753.

Walsh, D. V., & Liu, L. (2014). Adaptation to a simulated central scotoma during visual search training, Vision Research, 96, 75-86.

Whitford, V., O'Driscoll, G. A., Pack, C. C., Joober, R., Malla, A., & Titone, D. (2013). Reading impairments in Schizophrenia relate to individual differences in phonological processing and oculomotor control: Evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 57-75.

Yang, S.-N. (2009). Effects of gaze-contingent text changes on fixation duration in reading. Vision Research, 49, 2843-2855.

Boundary Paradigm

Angele, B., Laishley, A. E., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2014). The effect of high- and low-frequency previews and sentential fit on word skipping during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1181-1203.

Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2011). Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: Do the preceding words matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1210-1220.

Angele, B., Slattery, T., Yang, J., Kliegl, R., & Rayner, K. (2008). Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously. Visual Cognition, 16, 697 - 707.

Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2013). Eye movements and parafoveal preview of compound words: Does morpheme order matter? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 505-526.

Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2013). Processing the in the Parafovea: Are articles skipped automatically? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 39, 649-662.

Angele, B., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2013). Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39, 526-538.

Bélanger, N. N., Mayberry, R. I., & Rayner, K. (2013). Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: Parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2237-2252.

Choi, W., & Gordon, P. C. (2013). Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: The role of implicit lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39, 1032-1046.

Choi, W., & Gordon, P. C. (2014). Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 76, 201-213.

Cui, L., Drieghe, D., Yan, G., Bai, X., Chi, H., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Parafoveal processing across different lexical constituents in Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 403-416.

Cui, L., Drieghe, D., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2014). Parafoveal preview benefit in unspaced and spaced Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2172-2188.

Cui, L., Yan, G., Bai, X., Hyönä, J., Wang, S. & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Processing of compound word characters in reading chinese: An eye movement contingent display change study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 527-547.

Cutter, M. G., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2014). Preview benefit in English spaced compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1778-1786.

Dare, N., & Shillcock, R. (2013). Serial and parallel processing in reading: Investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 487-504.

Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415-422.

Deutsch, A., & Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 487-506.

Drieghe, D., Pollatsek, A., Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2010). Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary. Cognition, 116, 136-142.

Eiter, B. M., & Inhoff, A. W. (2010). Visual word recognition during reading is followed by subvocal articulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 457-470.

Frisson, S., Bélanger, N. N., & Rayner, K. (2014). Phonological and orthographic overlap effects in fast and masked priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1742-1767.

Gagl, B., Hawelka, S., Richlan, F., Schuster, S., & Hutzler, F. (2014) Parafoveal preprocessing in reading revisited: Evidence from a novel preview manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 588-595.

Gordon, P. C., Plummer, P., & Choi, W. (2013). See before you jump: Full recognition of parafoveal words precedes skips during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 633-641.

Häikiö, T., Hyönä, J., Bertram, R. (2010). Development of parafoveal processing within and across words in reading: Evidence from the boundary paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1982-1998.

Hohenstein, S., Laubrock, J., & Kliegl, R. (2010). Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1150-1170.

Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Semantic preview benefit during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 166-190.

Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The role of visual working memory in the control of gaze during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 936-949.

Hyönä, J., Bertram, R., & Pollatsek, A. (2004). Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement contingent display change study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 523-532.

Hyönä, J., & Häikiö, T. (2005). Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 475-483.

Inhoff, A. W., Connine, C., Eiter, B., Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2004). Phonological representation of words in working memory during sentence reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 320-325.

Inhoff, A. W., Eiter, B. M., & Radach, R. (2005). Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 979-995.

Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Eiter, B., & Juhasz, B. (2003). Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 803-827.

Inhoff, A. W., Solomon, M. S., Seymour, B. A., & Radach, R. (2008). Eye position changes during reading fixations are spatially selective. Vision Research, 48, 1027-1039.

Inhoff, A. W. & Radach, R. (2014). Parafoveal preview benefits during silent and oral reading: Testing the parafoveal information extraction hypothesis. Visual Cognition, 22, 354-376.

Jones, M. W., Ashby, J., & Branigan, H. P. (2013). Dyslexia and fluency: Parafoveal and foveal influences on rapid automatized naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39, 554-567.

Jordan, T. R., McGowan, V. A., & Paterson, K. B. (2013). What's left? An eye movement study of the influence of interword spaces to the left of fixation during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 551-557.

Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2014). Task Relevance Induces Momentary Changes in the Functional Visual Field During Reading. Psychological Science, 25, 626-632.

Kliegl, R., Risse, S., & Laubrock, J. (2007). Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1250-1255.

Kliegl, R., Hohenstein, S., Yan, M., & McDonald, S. A. (2013). How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 581-600.

Masserang, K. M., & Pollatsek, A. (2012). Transposed letter effects in prefixed words: Implications for morphological decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 476-495.

McDonald, S. A. (2006). Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal. Vision Research, 46, 4416-4424.

Morgan, J. L., & Meyer, A. S. (2005). Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 428-442.

Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2010). Testing for lexical competition during reading: Fast priming with orthographic neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 36, 477-492.

Payne, B. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2012). Aging, parafoveal preview, and semantic integration in sentence processing: Testing the cognitive workload of wrap-up. Psychology and Aging, 27, 638-649.

Perea, M., Nakatani, C., & van Leeuwen, C. (2011). Transposition effects in reading Japanese Kana: Are they orthographic in nature? Memory & Cognition, 39, 700-707.

Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 261-290.

Radach, R., Inhoff, A. W., Glover, L., & Vorstius, C. (2013). Contextual constraint and N+2 preview effects in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 619-633.

Rayner, K., & Schotter, E. R. (2014). Semantic preview benefit in reading English: The effect of initial letter capitalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1617-1628.

Rayner, K., Angele, B., Schotter, E. R., & Bicknell, K. (2013). On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews? Visual Cognition, 21, 353-381.

Rayner, K., Castelhano, M.S., & Yang, J. (2010). Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 25, 714-718.

Risse, S. (2014). Effects of visual span on reading speed and parafoveal processing in eye movements during sentence reading. Journal of Vision, 14(8):11, 1-13, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/14/8/11, doi:10.1167/14.8.11.

Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. Psychology and Aging, 26, 451-460.

Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1026-1042.

Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 653-668.

Schotter, E. R. (2013). Synonyms provide semantic preview benefit in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 619-633.

Slattery, T. J., Schotter, E. R., Berry, R. W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Parafoveal and foveal processing of abbreviations during eye fixations in reading: Making a case for case. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1022-1031.

Tsai, J. -L., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2012). Parafoveal semantic information extraction in traditional Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica, 141, 17-23.

Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Yen, N.-S. (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain and Language, 91, 235-244.

Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2014). Lexical quality and eye movements: Individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 703-727.

Wang, C.-A., & Inhoff, A. W. (2010). The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 805-817.

Wang, C.-A., Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (2009). Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1487-1494.

Wang, C.-A., Tsai, J.-L., Inhoff, A. W., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2009). Acquisition of linguistic information to the left of fixation during the reading of Chinese text. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1097-1123.

Wang, C.-A., Boehnke, S. E., White, B. J., & Munoz, D. P. (2012). Microstimulation of the Monkey Superior Colliculus Induces Pupil Dilation Without Evoking Saccades. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 3629 - 3636.

Wang, A., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Yan, M. (2014). Reading proficiency modulates parafoveal processing efficiency: Evidence from reading Chinese as a second language, Acta Psychologica, 152, 29-33.

White, S. J., Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2008). Semantic processing of previews within compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 34, 988-993.

White, S. J., Warren, T., & Reichle, E. D. (2011). Parafoveal preview during reading: Effects of sentence position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1221-1238.

Winskel, H. (2011). Orthographic and phonological parafoveal processing of consonants, vowels, and tones when reading Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 739-759.

Winskel, H., & Perea, M. (2014). Can parafoveal-on-foveal effects be obtained when reading an unspaced alphasyllabic script (Thai)? Writing Systems Research, 6, 94-104.

Winskel, H., & Salehuddin, K. (2014). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects when reading derived words in Malay. Kajian Malaysia, 32, 23-40.

Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J., & Zhou, X. (2010). Parafoveal load of word n+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word n+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1669-1676.

Yan, M., Richter, E., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Chinese readers extract semantic information from parafoveal words during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561-566.

Yan, M., Risse, S., Zhou, X., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Preview fixation duration modulates identical and semantic preview benefit in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 25, 1093-1111.

Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1069-1075.

Yan, M., Pan, J., Laubrock, J., Kliegl, R., & Shu, H. (2013). Parafoveal processing efficiency in rapid automatized naming: A comparison between Chinese normal and dyslexic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 579-589.

Yan, M., Luo, Y., & Inhoff, A. W. (2014). Syllable articulation influences foveal and parafoveal processing of words during the silent reading of Chinese sentences, Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 93-103.

Yang, J. (2013). Preview effects of plausibility and character order in reading Chinese transposed words: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, S18-S34.

Yang, J., Rayner, K., Li, N., & Wang, S. (2012). Is preview benefit from word n + 2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 25, 1079-1091.

Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 35, 1192-1204.

Yang, J., Li, N., Wang, S., Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2014). Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese. Visual Cognition, 22, 193-213.

Yen, M.-H., Tsai, J.-L., Tzeng, O. J.-L., & Hung, D. L. (2008). Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1033-1045.

Zhou, W., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2013). A validation of parafoveal semantic information extraction in reading Chinese. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, S51-S63,

saccade contingent/Transsacadic perception (no saccade adpatation )

Chapman, C. S., Hunt, A. R. & Kingstone, A. (2007). Squeezing uncertainty from saccadic compression. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 1(1):2, 1-5, http://jemr.org/.

Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). Limits on integrating motion information across saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 44-54.

Dickinson, C. A., & Intraub, H. (2008). Transsaccadic representation of layout: What is the time course of boundary extension? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 543-555.

Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Programming of exogenous and endogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1039-1054.

Gordon, R. D., & Vollmer, S. D. (2010). Episodic representation of diagnostic and nondiagnostic object colour. Visual Cognition, 18, 728-750.

Gordon, R. D., Vollmer, S. D., & Frankl, M. L. (2008). Object continuity and the transsaccadic representation of form. Perception and Psychophysics, 70, 667-679.

Guez, J., Morris, A. P., & Krekelberg, B. (2013). Intrasaccadic suppression is dominated by reduced detector gain. Journal of Vision, 13(8):4, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/13/8/4, doi:10.1167/13.8.4.

Gysen, V., De Graef, P., & Verfaillie, K. (2002). Detection of intrasaccadic displacements and depth rotations of moving objects. Vision Research, 42, 379-391.

Gysen, V., Verfaillie, K., & De Graef, P. (2002). Transsaccadic perception of translating objects: Effects of landmark objects and visual field position. Vision Research, 42, 1785-1796.

Gysen, V., Verfaillie, K., & De Graef, P. (2002). The effect of stimulus blanking on the detection of intrasaccadic displacements of translating objects. Vision Research, 42, 2021-2030.

Henderson, J. M., & Pierce, G. L. (2008). Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of fixation durations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 566-573.

Intraub, H. & Dickinson, C. A. (2008). False memory 1/20th of a second later: What the early onset of boundary extension reveals about perception. Psychological Science, 19, 1007-1014.

Mathôt, S. & Theeuwes, J. (2012). It's all about the transient: Intra-saccadic onset stimuli do not capture attention. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(2):4, 1-12.

Mruczek, R. E. B., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2007). Activity of inferior temporal cortical neurons predicts recognition choice behavior and recognition time during visual search. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2825-2836.

Silvis, J. D., & Donk, M. (2014). The effects of saccade-contingent changes on oculomotor capture: salience is important even beyond the first oculomotor response. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 76, 1803-1814.

Tas, A. C., Moore, C. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2012). An object-mediated updating account of insensitivity to transsaccadic change. Journal of Vision, 12(11):18, 1-13, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/12/11/18, doi:10.1167/12.11.18.

Van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2010). Awareness of the saccade goal in oculomotor selection: Your eyes go before you know. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 861-871.

Velichkovsky, B. M., Dornhoefer, S. M., Kopf, M., Helmert, J., & Joos, M. (2002). Change detection and occlusion modes in road-traffic scenarios. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5, 99-109.

Wittenberg, M., Bremmer, F., & Wachtler, T. (2008). Perceptual evidence for saccadic updating of color stimuli. Journal of Vision, 8(14):9, 1-9, http://journalofvision.org/8/14/9/, doi:10.1167/8.14.9.

Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2001). Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation times. Vision Research, 41, 3567-3585.

Gaze Control/Selection by eye

Beck, M. R., Peterson, M. S., Boot, W. R., Vomela, M., & Kramer, A. F. (2006). Explicit memory for rejected distractors during visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 150-174.

Boot, W. R., McCarley, J. S, Kramer, A. F., & Peterson, M. S. (2004). Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 854-861.

Dickinson, C. A., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2005). Marking rejected distractors: A gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1120-1126.

Holm, L., & Mäntylä, T. (2007). Memory for scenes: Refixations reflect retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1664-1674.

Mäntylä, T., & Holm, L. (2006). Gaze control and recollective experience in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 14, 365-386.

McCarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., & Peterson, M. S. (2002). Overt and covert object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 751-758.

 

Back to Top